<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women, marriage and health insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/</link>
	<description>by Philip N. Cohen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demography and destiny for voters &#171; Family Inequality</title>
		<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/#comment-49519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demography and destiny for voters &#171; Family Inequality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-49519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and although single women might be more worried about access, that&#8217;s because they&#8217;re less likely to have health insurance. In short, even if some women do have a strong identity as members of the single-women category, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and although single women might be more worried about access, that&#8217;s because they&#8217;re less likely to have health insurance. In short, even if some women do have a strong identity as members of the single-women category, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip N. Cohen: Mammography&#8217;s Income Gradient &#124; Klipizlesene.info - Cartoon Karikatürler - News -Haberler - Comics - Komikler</title>
		<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip N. Cohen: Mammography&#8217;s Income Gradient &#124; Klipizlesene.info - Cartoon Karikatürler - News -Haberler - Comics - Komikler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] without it&#8217;s just 56%. And to make matters more rational &#8212; and less humane &#8212; being married helps, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] without it&#8217;s just 56%. And to make matters more rational &#8212; and less humane &#8212; being married helps, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mammography&#8217;s income gradient &#171; Family Inequality</title>
		<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mammography&#8217;s income gradient &#171; Family Inequality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] without it&#8217;s just 56%. And to make matters more rational &#8212; and less humane &#8212; being married helps, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] without it&#8217;s just 56%. And to make matters more rational &#8212; and less humane &#8212; being married helps, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip N. Cohen: Who Rules the Recliner Now? &#124; Loans in</title>
		<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip N. Cohen: Who Rules the Recliner Now? &#124; Loans in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] between married and unmarried people &#8211; as we&#8217;ve seen before, for example with health insurance. The Pew report calculates income adjusted for household size, and shows that married people are in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between married and unmarried people &#8211; as we&#8217;ve seen before, for example with health insurance. The Pew report calculates income adjusted for household size, and shows that married people are in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More wives make more &#171; Family Inequality</title>
		<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More wives make more &#171; Family Inequality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] between married and unmarried people &#8211; as we&#8217;ve seen before, for example with health insurance. The Pew report calculates income adjusted for household size, and shows that married people are in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between married and unmarried people &#8211; as we&#8217;ve seen before, for example with health insurance. The Pew report calculates income adjusted for household size, and shows that married people are in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/women-marriage-and-health-insurance/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Betsy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The religious right wing so opposes health insurance reform because the further we go toward universal health coverage, the less dependent women will be on patriarchal marriage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The religious right wing so opposes health insurance reform because the further we go toward universal health coverage, the less dependent women will be on patriarchal marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
