Take my words for it: homogamy and heterogamy

Not really my words, just my proposal for how to use words.

I’m unhappy with the state of language around marriage, cohabitation, partnerships, couples, mates — what demographers sometimes refer to as “unions.” This is my proposal to improve the language.

Take marriage. “Marriage” almost always refers to the regular, normal, legal marriage. And when some Other kind of marriage comes along, it gets a different name, especially “same-sex marriage.” Then, if the two are compared, we might get references to “opposite-sex marriage.”

This is like so many other examples of the dominant — normative, hegemonic — group being anointed to the linguistic throne of invisible deference. As when the icon for person is the same as the one for man, while the one for woman is different. Race is another big one.

homogamy: union between people of the same sex; heterogamy: union between people of different sexes

Categorization

Social science has English terms to categorize systems of families and relationships — including monogamy, polygamy, polygyny, hypergamy, matrilineal, patrilineal, and so on. There is good scientific reason to put such systems or relationships in categories, with labels — like species or elements.

What we don’t have is a sensible, symmetrical, inclusive set of terms for marriage that incorporates the unions of men with men, women with men, and women with women.

I prefer homogamy and heterogamy. The words are from the Greek for same and different (homo/hetero) and marriage (gamos), although gamos has been used for lots of mating and pairing terms that aren’t legal marriage.

I don’t like “same-sex” and “opposite-sex” because the sexes aren’t opposites. They’re different — partly because we make them that way — and “opposite” exaggerates those differences. (Plus, why “sex” instead of “gender”?) Also, unlike “gay marriage,” for example, homogamy and heterogamy don’t presume to differentiate people based on their sexual orientation — which is not a prerequisite for any kind of marriage.

Researchers already use “homogamy” a lot in family studies, but always to refer to similarity between partners on everything else except sex/gender. As in “educational homogamy” for couples with similar education. But we can get around that (using words like endogamy and homophily). Now that real homogamous marriage is catching on, we can set those uses aside.

I know these aren’t the easiest terms to say and write. But it’s an improvement, and it’s worth a try. Consider examples such as:

  • “Advocates for the legal recognition of homogamous marriage celebrated today…”
  • “The dominant system of heterogamous marriage prevailed in Europe for centuries…”
  • “The rise in homogamy among young couples poses a challenge for the prom police in many schools…”

I have laid this proposal out in more detail [now] published in the journal Family Theory and Review. It is available here.

32 Comments

Filed under Me @ work

32 responses to “Take my words for it: homogamy and heterogamy

  1. Pingback: What is the opposite of gay marriage? « Family Inequality

  2. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: What is the Opposite of Gay Marriage? | Gabbur

  3. Pingback: Your family, immediately « Family Inequality

  4. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Your Family, Immediately — NabinPradhan.Com

  5. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Your Family, Immediately « Read NEWS

  6. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Your Family, Immediately | GoodPorkBadPork.com

  7. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Your Family, Immediately | CelebUtopia

  8. Pingback: Gay prom controversy (1980-2010) « Family Inequality

  9. Pingback: Anti-gay authority « Family Inequality

  10. Pingback: For families, and…? « Family Inequality

  11. Pingback:   Philip N. Cohen: For Families, And…? by How To Get Rich And Stay

  12. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: For Families, And…? | Barack Obama and USA

  13. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Institutional Discrimination Is Bad for Mental Health | GoodPorkBadPork.com

  14. Pingback: Institutional discrimination is bad for mental health « Family Inequality

  15. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Gay and Lesbian Parents Making the Grade « In The News « Obama America

  16. Pingback: Gay and lesbian parents making the grade « Family Inequality

  17. Pingback: Cohabitation’s neotraditional turn « Family Inequality

  18. Pingback: Coupling inequality « Family Inequality

  19. Pingback: Homogamy: Start the presses « Family Inequality

  20. Pingback: Like Goldfish: The Sexual and Cultural Revolution in Ôoku, Vols. 3 and 4, Part 1 « The Lobster Dance

  21. odorunara

    Plus, why “sex” instead of “gender”?

    Because sex and gender aren’t the same thing. You could have an heterogamous relationship with partners who were quite similar in gender roles/expression despite having different biological sexes.

  22. Pingback: Civil rights bonanza (demographic fiasco) « Family Inequality

  23. Pingback: High marks for Census « Family Inequality

  24. Pingback: Poll: What do you call homogamous marriage? « Family Inequality

  25. Pingback: Gender Reader (May 2012) « The Lobster Dance

  26. Pingback: This is Your Girl Brain on Beer « I'll Make It Myself!

  27. Pingback: Teaching family inequality: Some posts by subject | Family Inequality

  28. Pingback: American Sociological Association releases SCOTUS brief | Family Inequality

  29. Pingback: Can the marriage movement survive gay marriage? | Family Inequality

  30. Pingback: Educational endogamy (a good Princeton word), ca. 2011 | Family Inequality

  31. Pingback: College Graduates Marry Other College Graduates Most of the Time | CCLAH

  32. Pingback: History Lessons from the Tokugawa Matriarchy | Have You Nerd

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s