National Organization for Marriage: delusional and hateful?

I pose the title as a question, and leave it to the reader to judge (naturally). The evidence today is from Alvin McEwen at Firedoglake, who links to a strategy document from the National Organization for Marriage that has come out as part of that organization’s legal battle to keep its donor list secret.

The document is titled “Marriage: $20 Million Strategy for Victory.” It details some of their plans to oppose the extension of marriage rights to homogamous couples (on language), relying on ballot initiatives rather than the courts and legislatures, the source of traditional civil rights advances.

Are they delusional? Here’s one thing:

Are they hateful? Here’s another thing:

You be the judge.

FYI, NOM was quickly out with a response today, a vivid demonstration of the strategy, which read in part:

NOM … has worked extensively with supporters of traditional marriage from every color, creed and background [listing some of their best friends prominent leaders] … Gay marriage advocates have attempted to portray same-sex marriage as a civil right, but the voices of these and many other leaders have provided powerful witness that this claim is patently false.

I have previously written about Black Christian opposition to marriage rights in Maryland, which divided Democrats and almost prevented the state legislature from passing the law (which it now has).

9 Comments

Filed under In the news

9 responses to “National Organization for Marriage: delusional and hateful?

  1. Pingback: DOMA can’t survive rationality « Family Inequality

  2. Pingback: Is sameness the kiss of marital demise? « Family Inequality

  3. Pingback: Have we passed the homogamy tipping point? « Family Inequality

  4. Pingback: Conservatives doubling down on single mothers and crime « Family Inequality

  5. Pingback: The best they’ve got for DOMA? | Family Inequality

  6. Pingback: Can the marriage movement survive gay marriage? | Family Inequality

  7. Pingback: The Most Surprising Thing About Conservatives Embracing Gay Marriage – The Atlantic | LGBT Indonesia

  8. Pingback: The Atlantic Concedes a Point | Maggie Gallagher

  9. Pingback: Arthur Brooks’s worldliness is showing | Family Inequality

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s