National Children’s Study before national healthcare

The NYT reports on the giant National Children’s Study, which aims to study a cohort of 100,000 children from the first trimester till age 21. They’re going to take blood, urine, placentas, feces, GPS data, schools, neighbors — the works — in a colossal attempt to see what makes children tick, tock and stop ticking in America.

However, the study, run by the NIH, and set to cost $3.1 billion $6.7 billion, or whatever, is finding it more difficult than anticipated to recruit pregnant women, which was the angle of the NYT story. They’re knocking on doors to find women who are pregnant. After acknowledging the multi-billion-dollar budget problem, the NYT reports:

new recruiting methods will be tried, including having doctors encourage patients to enroll. That was previously rejected because investigators felt doctor-referred patients would exclude some women, like those not getting prenatal care.

This all seems inefficient. Is there no list of pregnant women they could randomly sample from? Oh, yeah: no national healthcare system. That’s why there are women who don’t get prenatal care. So how much of this moon-shot-sized budget is going toward working around the simple, ugly fact of America’s healthcare rationing?

As an aside, one of the NCS study sites is in Duplin County, North Carolina, run by the Carolina Population Center (at which I am a fellow). In 2006, I had the pleasure of visiting Duplin County, which has a rapidly growing Latino population, part of the unsung new-rural immigrant reality emerging in the last several decades. That’s where I took this picture, at Grady Elementary School.

1 Comment

Filed under In the news, Research reports

One response to “National Children’s Study before national healthcare

  1. Philip, the other problem is that they are trying to recruit through neighborhoods based on Census data that are 10 years old. Places that might have had a lot of women of child-rearing ages ten years ago might not have any now. Of course, if certain Congressional representatives had their way, we wouldn’t know anything because the Census budget would also be drastically cut as “government waste.”


Comments welcome (may be moderated)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s