Recession, resilience, divorce?

Updated December 29, 2009.

Delivering some “good news for Christmas,” The National Marriage Project, under the editorship of the sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox, has released a report titled The State of Our Unions, 2009: Money and Marriage. It has a lot of useful information on marriage and families, with some editorial bending in the pro-marriage-and-family direction.

My beef here is with the chapter titled “The Great Recession’s Silver Lining?” In it, Wilcox writes:

judging by divorce trends, many couples appear to be developing a new appreciation for the economic and social support that marriage can provide in tough times. Thus, one piece of good news emerging from the last two years is that marital stability is up.

That line was quoted by Ross Douthat at the New York Times, which is a shame, because there is no evidence about anyone’s appreciation for marriage in the chapter. Instead, the evidence for this assertion is presented in a graph that shows three data points in the divorce-rate trend:

The figure shows a decline in the divorce rate from 2007 to 2008. In the press release he calls that drop “the first annual dip since 2005.” (The rate shown here is divorces in a given year per 1,000 married women in the population that year.) Couple things:

1. There is no data point for 2006, so for all we know the divorce rate actually rose higher than it was in 2007, and started falling before the recession, which officially began in December 2007.

2. Despite the dramatic turnaround apparent in this graph, it’s really not enough to go on to draw the kind of conclusion he draws.

The second point is more important, because there really is a lot of research that shows job loss increases the odds of divorce. So why should this recession be different? It’s possible it is, but there’s no evidence – in this report or elsewhere that I’ve seen – of such a change.

In fairness, Wilcox wrote a column in the Wall Street Journal that musters some anecdotal evidence for his theory. But nothing to get him this far: “For most married Americans, the Great Recession seems to be solidifying, not eroding, the marital bond.” Even if the divorce did drop a little in one year – that doesn’t say anything about “most married Americans.”

That three-point graph is especially unfortunate because it leads to interpretations like this: “The divorce rate … had previously been on an upward path, rising from 16.4 divorces per 1,000 married women in 2005 to 17.5 in 2007.” That seriously misstates the real trend in divorce rates, which have actually been falling since 1981. And there is nothing in the trend to suggest that recessions teach couples a “new appreciation for the economic and social support that marriage can provide in tough times.” In the appendix, Wilcox presents that longer trend, which makes his previous figure seem much less dramatic.

(The graph seems a little off to me – notice how 10.6 is closer to the line for 10 than 14.9 is to the line for 15 – but I’ll work from his numbers below anyway.)

I think the story of a turnaround in divorce rates has traction because, like crime, divorce is one of those things many people assume is always getting worse (I see this in student papers frequently). So any decline in divorce rates looks like an important change.

What is recession’s effect?

I previously speculated that, because this recession was costing so many men their jobs, more men were likely to be become primary caregivers, and do more housework. The downside – I speculated – was that “maybe men getting ‘stuck’ with childcare doesn’t bode well for marriages.” To support that speculation, I showed a graph of divorce rates that had little upward spikes during some recent recessions. The graph was not the real evidence for the argument – which was here:

We already know that economic hard times contribute to marital instability and divorce. Studyafter study after study have found that losing a job increases the likelihood of divorce, with some evidence that husbands’ losses matter more.

Here is a new graph I made, with the “crude divorce rate” (divorces per 1,000 people in the population) in blue, superimposed over Wilcox’s calculations in red. (His takes more work, which is probably why he doesn’t have it for every year. But they track quite well, with some pulling apart some after 1980, which has to do with changes in the population composition that probably aren’t important.) I also put the recessions on there, roughly, by hand with purple bars.

Source: Divorce rates from 2010 Statistical Abstract and various prior years; business cycles from 2010 Statistical Abstract.

Two things here:

1. Over the longer run, there is no obvious relationship between recessions and the divorce rate. There are big social forces at work here (like the rise of the legal practice of no-fault divorce, the increase in women’s education and employment, the growing tendency of men and women of similar education levels to marry, later age at marriage, more cohabitation and unmarried childbearing, etc.). But on the surface – which is where the Wilcox conclusion is drawn – there is not much to go on.

2. The crude divorce rate I got from the Statistical Abstracts shows a little peak in 2006 – not 2007 – followed by two consecutive years of decline, beginning before the recession. So rather than talk about the reason for the decline in the last year – which really just fits in with the falling divorce rates since 1981 – the anomaly is 2006. I have no explanation for that, but in the long run it probably doesn’t matter much.

On the other hand, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers has surveyed its members twice since the recession started. In the first release last fall, they said 37% expected a drop in divorce filings, compared with 19% who usually see an increase during recessions. This fall they report that 57% of their members experienced a drop in filings, with just 14% seeing an increase. There are no details or methods reported in these releases, so it’s hard to evaluate. But if it’s true – along with the previous evidence that unemployment increases divorce – then it maybe that recessions delay the timing of divorce filings while increasing the divorce rate for those affected in the long run.

On the third hand, Jay Livingston at Montclair State points out that the NY Times reports that, in New York’s recession-year court backlog,  “Cases involving charges like assault by family members were up 18 percent statewide.”

Whether delayed divorce filings contribute to family violence is a question someone might be able to answer when they put all this together. But I doubt the final word will end up as simple as, “Couples too broke to bicker,” as heartwarming as that is. There may be something to the speculation that falling home prices are stalling some divorce plans, but that is not quite the same as developing a newfound appreciation for the benefits of marriage.

I’m sticking with this: in hard times, families are a big part of how people make it through, but hard times are also hard for a lot of marriages. If it’s true that the husband’s job loss especially increases stress on a marriage – as previous research suggests – we may yet see that emerge for the current crisis. If not, maybe something has changed.

UPDATE January 5: Wilcox clarifies his interpretation in an interview at National Review Online:

The Great Recession may be fostering a renewed appreciation for marriage and family life. … One indication of this is that divorce is down (modestly) in the first full year of the Great Recession. Scholars disagree about why this is the case. Some think couples are simply postponing a divorce until the economy rebounds. Others think that the recent divorce decline is part and parcel of a larger divorce decline that began in 1980. But I think part of the story here is that a large minority of couples are developing a renewed appreciation for the social and economic support that marriage and families can provide.

There is still no evidence for this “renewed appreciation” theory, however.

28 Comments

Filed under In the news, Research reports

28 responses to “Recession, resilience, divorce?

  1. You are right that these small fluctuations mean quite little in the larger historical trend, but there is some evidence that families are more likely to stick together when they befall economic hard times. As the saying goes, “Divorce is expensive,…” If people who are unhappily married are unsure if they can manage economically on their own, or if their marital assets will be harder to divide under current economic circumstances (due to the housing crash, for example), then they may be more likely to ride out the recession. That doesn’t mean that they are happier in their marriages or will stay married when the economy improves. I would expect an uptick in the divorce rate once the unemployment rate improves.

  2. Thanks – I agree. Marital dissolution is a longer-term process that may be recorded as a discrete event (divorce) in court at a single, almost arbitrary point in time. Unemployment may affect the timing – and the real estate thing is a bona fide wrinkle – but in general economic stress increases the odds of divorce. (In fact, divorce rates have been falling mostly for the college educated.)

    It is interesting to wonder what the larger effects might be, though. Wilcox says “most married Americans” think something based on a small change in the divorce rate, which is like saying “most Americans” are losing faith in Obama when his approval rating falls 10%. But maybe there is a general effect of economic crises – and that will surely only emerge over the life course of the young people now experiencing it.

  3. When we come into a relationship the last thing we think of is getting a divorce and what we do down the road if things do not’t work out. We love and feel that this is the best since sliced bread. When we get married and go through the honeymoon phase. Unfortunately, things calm down and people are relaxed. That is when our guard is let down and we’ll see the person for who they really are.

  4. Pingback: Divorce rate trends – selective framing » Graphic Sociology

  5. Pingback: Guest Post: Recession, Resilience, Divorce? » Sociological Images

  6. Pingback: Get your News: Get live news from all around the world » Philip N. Cohen: Recession begets family violence

  7. Pingback: The dangers of zooming in « Karl Bakeman

  8. Pingback: Child abuse in the recession « Family Inequality

  9. Pingback: Charting welfare numbers « Family Inequality

  10. I competely agree that family is more important in times like these as we all stick together. However, there also seems to be a rise in couples putting off divorce due to the cost implications, and if divorce is the right path for them , then this can be very damaging.

  11. Pingback: Coupling inequality « Family Inequality

  12. Pingback: Why aren’t marriages getting happier? « Family Inequality

  13. Pingback: 2010′s top 10 « Family Inequality

  14. Pingback: Multigenerational families, recession studies « Family Inequality

  15. Pingback: Find that food stamp spike graphic meme « Family Inequality

  16. Pingback: Distorting data on divorce at the National Marriage Project « Family Inequality

  17. Pingback: Recession, divorce? « Family Inequality

  18. Pingback: Patriarchy, Recession, and Marital Hapiness « Iranianredneck’s Weblog

  19. Pingback: Misreading Marriage Statistics - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine

  20. Pingback: Misreading Marriage Statistics | Daily Libertarian

  21. Pingback: Is it a “marriage problem”? « Family Inequality

  22. Pingback: Google searches foretold Census report of divorce increase? « Family Inequality

  23. Pingback: Church saves marriage, and produces curious coefficients « Family Inequality

  24. Pingback: National Marriage Project Does S***ty Research Again; People Always Thought Students Couldn’t Write; and More « Welcome to the Doctor's Office

  25. Pingback: Platinum Dreams on a Paupers Budget: The Real Danger Behind Weddings | JolieSavant

  26. Pingback: Divorce drop and rebound: paper in the news | Family Inequality

  27. Pingback: Silver linings divorce trend | Family Inequality

  28. Pingback: Deciphering a well-told data story, cars are good for kids edition | Family Inequality

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s