Divorce, handguns, Obama, Top Chef, Tea Party

I’ve done some experimenting with “rapid response demography,” using Google tools to track time trends for marriage and divorce, recession and divorce and unemployment. Beyond time, we also could look at spatial variation, less for trends than for clues to cognitive, cultural, or subtle demographic patterns we weren’t expecting. Since my thinking is exploratory, and this is a blog, I’ll share what I found without attempting to draw conclusions. This uses the Google Correlate tool, a free tool (login required) described in some detail in this whitepaper.

With the new American Community Survey marital event data, for the first time we have recent divorce incidence data for every state (the weak vital records apparatus for divorce in the US is slower, inconsistent, and doesn’t include all states). I combined 2008 and 2009, and calculated the rate of divorce per 1,000 married women.

So, what were people searching Google for in the states with the highest divorce rates? Handguns.

This isn’t just a fluke with Colt 45. Out of the 90 terms most correlated – across states – with the divorce rate, 28 are about guns, and not the hunting kind but things like “kel-tech sub 2000″ and “glock custom.” I don’t see a clear pattern in the rest of the list, though “splenda cake” and “low carb thanksgiving” are intriguing.

Way down the list, though, at #93, with a correlation of only .60, is “tea party.” After #90, Google doesn’t give you a state map, so I made this scatterplot:

The states where people search for “tea party” are also those where the divorce rate is higher. Which made me think of politics, and the simple correlation between divorce and the red-state-blue-state thing. Some writers have reported that red (politically conservative) states have high teen marriage/pregnancy and divorce rates, which is partly because of how much Evangelical Christians get pregnant and married at young ages.* But I haven’t seen a direct comparison with recent data. So here is the divorce rate with the Obama vote in 2008:

The states with higher divorce rates gave smaller shares of the vote to Obama in 2008. But this correlation isn’t so strong, just -.48 on a scale of 0 to 1. What if you put the Obama vote into the blender and ask what Google searches follow the Obama pattern? The answer is overwhelming: Top Chef:

Again, not a fluke. No less than 13 of the top 90 correlated search terms are about Top Chef (“bravo top chef,” “top chef episode,” etc.). Someone who has seen this show might have to give me some hypotheses for why Top Chef states went for Obama.**

Aside: Am I just cherry-picking results according to some preconceived agenda? No and yes. The green graphs are by Google, and they represent the #1 search correlations with the real-world state indicators I uploaded (divorce and Obama votes). The blue scatter plots are things that struck me as interesting, that I chose to pursue. That’s how exploration works: look at the pattern, dig around, repeat.

* Jennifer Glass and Philip Levchak presented a paper at the Population Association of American conference this year which analyzes divorce rates in all U.S. counties as a function of a variety of factors, including religious affiliations. The paper, which does not seem to have been published yet, concludes in part:

The results here show that communities with large concentrations of religious conservatives actually produce higher divorce rates than others. … The major pathway linking religious conservatism and divorce seems to be the tendency of conservative Protestantism to encourage the early cessation of education in favor of marriage and childbearing. [Although, they add, much of the conservative Protestant effect remains unexplained in their models.]

** Two nights ago, a Tweet from @MrBrwnIYZ: “Well ain’t this about a bitch… President Obama decides to do an address to the nation when Top Chef comes on!”

11 Comments

Filed under In the news, Me @ work

11 responses to “Divorce, handguns, Obama, Top Chef, Tea Party

  1. Ron

    Why do you assume that the search string “tea party” implies *positive* feelings towards the tea party?

    I search for all sorts of topics which I am morally and politically opposed to, yet still would like to know more about, either from simple intellectual curiosity or from a desire to “know your enemy”.

    Like

    • Right – I’m definitely not assuming that. In the case of a TV show, it might be a safer bet (though I have Googled shows just because I hear other people talking about them and wonder what the big deal is…). For what it’s worth, the correlation between “tea party” searches and Obama votes at the state level is -.52, so there are fewer “tea party” searches in the states that went for Obama. Just one clue.

      Like

  2. mark

    According to your reasoning, Washington, Oregon, New York and California like Sarah Palin more than other states.

    Like

  3. Tanya

    I love Top Chef and President Obama. My wild guess, based on my friends, is that liberal people like Bravo Reality TV. :) Seriously, Top Chef is about chefs from some of the purportedly best (usually expensive) restaurants in America, where the chefs use interesting ingredients and don’t only serve good old American food. I would guess the demographic interested in things like that are educated and wealthy people, many of whom are Democrats and therefore more likely to be supportive of Obama in the 2008 election. This is not scientific, just anecdotal. Something tells me W isn’t a big fan of foie gras, portobello mushrooms, truffle oil or sweetbreads. I could be wrong though :)

    Like

    • Ron

      W isn’t a big fan of foie gras …

      He lives on a ranch in the middle of the Texas desert. Not conducive to strolling down to the local farmers’ market.

      But he *did* cover his roof with solar panels, because living on a ranch in the middle of the Texas desert *is* conducive to solar electricity.

      Like

  4. Pingback: Stuff White people Google « Family Inequality

  5. Pingback: More Links :) « Permutations

  6. Pingback: Warning: What do smokers Google? « Family Inequality

  7. Pingback: MaddowColbert vs. FoxLimbaugh, Google edition « Family Inequality

  8. Pingback: Google correlations review « Family Inequality

  9. Pingback: Guns dividing America (Google edition) « Family Inequality

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s