Should academia track the number of times you've had your testimony thrown out of court by federal judges?
It would be unseemly of me to argue with a two-page book review instead of letting my life's work stand on its own, so here goes.
The decision was made at the level of the central administration, overriding negative recommendations from both the Department of Sociology faculty and the College of Liberal Arts.
What I would have said if I peer reviewed the book, knowing the notes were to become public.
They both use facts not to learn from but to demonstrate things they think they already know.
He's not concerned with the principle of coercing people into marriage, or even with violation of rights associated with verifying household comings and goings. He's just not sure it's feasible.
Why have half of my Mt. Everest climbers also been to the moon?
His bad research was part of a covertly-organized political effort, and he lied about it to cover that up.
These new reasons not to write or review for James Wright at Social Science Research will knock your socks off.
Sorry, Regnerus: That's gonna cost you half a grade right there.