Google index of poor mothers’ pain

In light of the mean-spirited Obama-wants-everyone-on-food-stamps meme, and the Heritage Foundation’s mocking attack on poor people as air-conditioned, Xbox-loving couch potatoes, let’s consider something else about poor single parents — especially poor mothers: their Google searches.

That’s right, in addition to refrigerators, apparently almost everyone in America today has Internet access — often at their local public libraries.

And yet they still complain about their little problems. They type searches into Google like, “help paying electric bill,” “hair falling out,” and even — presumably so they can laugh at the poor suckers who actually work for a living — “walmart jobs.”

The old “misery index” was just unemployment plus inflation. Maybe the new index to watch is Google searches for “help for single mothers.” Here is the trend for that search, along with one of the searches that most closely follows its trend, “walmart jobs.” The temporal correlation between these two — the amount they rise and fall together over time — is .96 on a scale of 0 to 1.

You can see the full list of 100 searches most correlated with “help for single mothers” by following this link.

After the poverty report came out last month, comedian Andy Borowitz tweeted, “One in six Americans is living in poverty, but the other five are more concerned about the changes to Facebook.” Whether you’re in the first group or the latter one — or neither — it’s worth pausing for a minute to think about the lives of people Googling things like, “help with rent,” “iud side effects,” “cheap dinner ideas” and “get a credit card with bad credit.” (The searches all correlate with “help for single mothers” at .94 or higher.)

A similar list comes up in the correlations with searches for “food stamps.” Here it is graphed with “housekeeping jobs,” correlated at .97:

The list of correlated searches is similar, including a preponderance of women’s health terms (“clots during period”) economic crises (“light bill”), and ideas for climbing out of an economic hole (“medical assistant jobs,” “dispatcher jobs”).

On the plus side, both of these trends peaked in mid-2010, for now. So maybe things have stopped getting worse quite so fast. Or maybe they just lost their Internet access at the library due to budget cuts.

Am I being selective, not reporting the searches like “loving this cool TV,” and “food stamps rule”? Not intentionally, but you never know. The links to the searches are above, and the data is free.

7 Comments

Filed under Me @ work

7 responses to “Google index of poor mothers’ pain

  1. Avis Cohen

    libraries have cut back on hours…. SO…. less access to computers on sunday, which was major cut.

  2. Belinda Luscombe

    Really interesting post Phillip, but mange and ear mites seem surprisingly high. As does Michigan. Am I reading it wrong or does this seem to be from a narrow sample?

  3. Thanks. There are a lot of pet related searches all over Google trends. I don’t think it’s a narrow sample, but rather just something we can’t explain with the info we have. Remember those are just several of thousands of pet health searches that happen to follow this trend. Michigan makes sense as a place with a severe poverty/unemployment problem, I think.

  4. KJ

    I wondered about the small sample issue too — I was surprised to see:

    0.9495hospital asheville nc
    0.9617chase atm locations
    0.9469hillsborough county clerk of court
    0.9466polk county clerk of courts

  5. I think the issue is that “help for single mothers” is a relatively rare search which fluctuates a lot, and in the millions of other searches, there are other rare searches that happen to hit the same trend.

    Google is not saying: “this is what single mothers are searching for.” It is my interpretation that — when there is a strong logical connection — it is likely to reflect single mothers’ search activity. I think it’s unlikely that such a relevant search as “walmart jobs” would rise to the top of the millions of possible correlations based on random chance. But “polk county clerk of courts” may be random (which just means we don’t know what drives its fluctuations).

  6. Pingback: Google correlations review « Family Inequality

  7. Pingback: Cash welfare down, food stamps, disability, marriage fiasco and extreme poverty up « Family Inequality

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s