In education, gender integration and stall

From housework to the legal profession, women enter fields that were male-dominated — but men don’t reciprocate.

There is a new review of the state of gender inequality in the U.S. by Paula England. She draws on a database of trends compiled by Reeve Vanneman and colleagues, among other sources, which show a marked stall in the movement of many indicators toward gender parity.

England’s article shows some striking trends in education, for example. There was a dramatic drop in segregation of college majors from the 1970s through the mid-1908s, followed by a prolonged stall and even a recent increase:

At the doctorate level, women are approaching 50% of all PhDs, but segregation between fields is still dramatic. Engineering, math and economics remain below 30% female (engineering is below 15%), while sociology, education and psychology are becoming female-dominated.

A number of these fields show stalled progress in the last 10 years, especially the most male-dominated.

To help explain the general stall, England makes the point that the “gender revolution” — which now appears to have occurred mostly in the 1970s and 1980s, as women closed gaps in earnings, education, housework, managerial representation and occupational integration, and patriarchal attitudes became less pronounced — involved a lot more change on the part of women than it did for men.

In particular, women entered formerly-male occupations and educational specialties much more than men entered women’s. That is partly because the cultural stigma that leads to devaluation of female-dominated work remains strong. That lack of reciprocal integration by men — who have added much less housework to their daily routines than women have shed, for example — is contributing to the stall in progress for women.

8 Comments

Filed under Research reports

8 responses to “In education, gender integration and stall

  1. Pingback: Delusions of dimorphism « Family Inequality

  2. Pingback: Philip N. Cohen: Time Check: “Women on Top” « In The News « Obama America

  3. Pingback: Time check « Family Inequality

  4. Pingback: In PhD hunt, men track men « Family Inequality

  5. Pingback: Left Blog Feeds | Philip N. Cohen: In Phd Hunt, Men Track Men

  6. Pingback: educationinformationonline.com » Blog Archive » Philip N. Cohen: In Phd Hunt, Men Track Men

  7. Pingback: Gender integration’s lost decade « Family Inequality

  8. Pingback: Book review: The Rise of Women, by DiPrete and Buchmann | Family Inequality

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s